Section 53A provides that, where the buyer has acquired ownership of the property, the property is the subject of the transfer, while fully fulfilling its part of the contract obligation, the seller is not entitled to disturb the ownership so granted to the buyer. It should be noted that Article 53A offers the proposed buyer protection against the contemptuous and pours out the contemptuous of the buyer`s troublesome property, but it does not heal the buyer`s ownership of the property. Ownership of the property remains in the hands of the seller. In 2012, in the case of Suraj Lamp & Industries (P) Ltd (2) v. the State of Haryana, the Supreme Court of India ruled as follows in the case of Suraj Lamp & Industries (P) Ltd (2) concerning the validity of sales of real estate made by proxy: laws relating to the registration of real estate transactions in India. 11. . .